When I began work in digital health eight years ago, I remember crowding around a laptop, trying various methods to get a $600 Android phone to be recognized by a laptop via USB cable. Getting something on that phone to actually work was even more exciting! These were the days of intensive field support for even the most basic solutions. Documentation was scant and solid support was based on knowing who the “right” person was to talk to at a technology firm.
A few years later, governments and donors began making increasingly large investments in digital health, but systems were not yet caught up to the hype. Most had not scaled up nationally, and of those that did, some did not last beyond the initial project’s funding or scope.
Fast forward to today. Last month’s fourth annual Global Digital Health Forum brought together the largest crowd yet for the event—more than 550 participants—and included representatives from ministries of health, implementing partners, and donors. (Presentations from the event are available here.) The Global Digital Health Network, formerly the mHealth Working Group, is a 3,000+ person-strong networking forum for members from 108 countries to share information, engage with the broader community, and provide leadership in digital health for global public health.
This year’s theme—“The Evolving Digital Health Landscape: Progress, Achievements and Remaining Frontiers”—was fitting, as digital health is clearly moving into an important new phase. Looking at the Gartner Hype Cycle below, the field seems to be moving from the trough of disillusionment to the slope of enlightenment:
There were relatively few new widgets or apps announced; instead, the focus was on a proliferation of toolkits and frameworks (see methodologies and best practices developing on the chart above). From discussions with the various groups providing software and services, there is an increased focus on productization (trying to provide greater ability for non-programmers to customize solutions out of the box) and a move away from custom solutions (see Third generation products, out of the box, product suites above). These resources go a long way in helping to avoid past mistakes and make better use of our existing digital health tools. Many sessions—linked below—highlighted tools that touch on the most critical components for successful digital health programs, including monitoring & evaluation, governance, security and privacy, interoperability, sustainability, and financing:
Monitoring, Measurement, Evaluation, and Learning
- Exploring Methodologies for Digital Tool Evaluation
- HIS Evaluation Framework Toolkit
- Financing in Digital Health
- Measuring Process Improvements Supported by Digital Health Initiatives
- Is It Working? Approaches for Measuring Impact of mHealth Interventions
- Knowledge Management for Digital Health
- Implementing IT Governance for National eHealth Development
- Proposed Framework for Development of eHealth strategy
- WHO Digital Health Atlas
- Maternal Messaging at Scale: Successes, Failures, and Future Directionality
- Digital Impact Alliance (DIAL): Beyond Scale
- Digital Health Investment Toolkit
- Global Digital Health Index
- Dimagi: Business Development for ICT4D
There were so many toolkits introduced, in fact, that there was a separate session just to help pick which was the right one for you!
Other useful tools which were presented at the event included the revamped Principles for Digital Development website that contains case studies and tools on a broad range of topics relevant to digital health. A new brief from the Mobile Alliance for Maternal Action (MAMA) has been similarly eye-opening, as it highlights 13 key lessons learned from India, Nigeria, Bangladesh, and South Africa. The MAMA approach uses age- and stage-based messaging directed toward pregnant women, new mothers, and families to foster behavior change and improve maternal and child health outcomes. Finally, the WHO Classification of Digital Health Interventions v1.0 is critical as it provides a much-needed update to the language we use to describe digital health.
Collectively, the tools discussed represent a very welcome advance in digital health. However, it will take concerted effort to ensure that awareness continues to be raised and their use institutionalized, thereby avoiding a similar trough of disillusionment.
Watch the video above to hear the author and JSI’s senior digital health advisor Steve Ollis share his key takeaways from the forum.
We must continue to work together to promote these tools, improve upon them, and see how we can maximize the effective and efficient use of scarce resources to better serve the communities we support.
Looking back at the hype cycle graphic, the slope of enlightenment is still an uphill climb. Setbacks and obstacles are inevitable as we continue to ascend, but we are heading in a positive direction.
*This post was originally published on February 1, 2018, on MCSP.